Comments on: Vimeo Vs Youtube Quality

By: F

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:09:13 +0000

Vimeo bitrate more higher than Youtube

By: Cole Ruddick

Cole Ruddick — Fri, 09 Sep 2011 03:58:29 +0000

As I’ve been researching the differences between YouTube & Vimeo, I appreciate that you posted videos from both sites to compare here. I’m pretty impressed by Vimeo so far.

I absolutely love you site, too! Keep up the awesome work. I’ll be back.

Thanks,
Cole

By: zenmeister

zenmeister — Mon, 04 Jul 2011 06:06:39 +0000

seems like an apples to oranges comparison. yt offers higher quality than what you used. so, i question the validity of this comparison. you compare against yt’s lowest quality. thanks for taking to post the videos.

By: anna

anna — Fri, 27 May 2011 07:19:15 +0000

Welcome
grey dimensiom
http://vimeo.com/24160360

By: jaz

jaz — Sat, 30 Apr 2011 11:34:30 +0000

yeah………vimeo videos are much better than YT.

By: Blog | Deelux: Graphic and web design from Providence, RI

Blog | Deelux: Graphic and web design from Providence, RI — Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:37:48 +0000

[...] service is better in terms of the technical quality of its video encoding (though certainly others have), I can declare Vimeo the winner in reputation and aesthetic terms. Let me [...]

By: YouTube pret Vimeo | LG Electronics blogs

YouTube pret Vimeo | LG Electronics blogs — Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:20:16 +0000

[...] Sal?dzini ar? Tu! [...]

By: YouTube versus Vimeo | LG Electronics blog

YouTube versus Vimeo | LG Electronics blog — Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:37:35 +0000

[...] ja vaata Vimeo ning YouTube’i omavahelist vägikaikavedu Nick Campbelli blogis. Kuid eks kasutajate arv räägib enda eest – YouTube’il oli selle aasta märtsis rohkem kui 91 [...]

By: „Vimeo“ prieš „YouTube“ | LG Electronics blogas

„Vimeo“ prieš „YouTube“ | LG Electronics blogas — Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:26:37 +0000

[...] Interneto svetain?je „Greyscalegorilla“ galite pamatyti detal? „YouTube“ ir „Vimeo“ vaizdo klip? bei komentar? palyginim?. [...]

By: John3

John3 — Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:58:34 +0000

This comparison was made in 2008.
I wonder if the result would be still the same if one would do the test now again.
Youtube introduced meanwhile new video-formats. (I don’t know if that also happened at vimeo?)

Anyway, the youtube video above uses youtubes “standard format” which is in terms of quality much worse than the “High Quality” format.
New Videos 4:3 videos, as in the test above, at youtube are stored 2 formats both, Standard and HQ. So it would be worth to do the test again.

btw. the youtube formats can be found here
(it’s in german but the important stuff are the numbers, you’ll get the picture)

http://www.vegasvideo.de/component/content/article/43-tutorials/95-youtube-formate.html