<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I Switched from Apple Aperture to Adobe Bridge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/2009/09/why-i-switched-from-apple-aperture-to-adobe-bridge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/2009/09/why-i-switched-from-apple-aperture-to-adobe-bridge/</link>
	<description>Cinema 4D And After Effects Training, Tutorials, and Plugins for Motion Graphic Designers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:34:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Imad</title>
		<link>http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/2009/09/why-i-switched-from-apple-aperture-to-adobe-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-44906</link>
		<dc:creator>Imad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/?p=3791#comment-44906</guid>
		<description>@Ssorzano
I had the same problems.  Plus Aperture 3 ran like a sick dog.  When you right click on the Aperture library, which is probably in your Picture folder, you can choose Show Package Contents.   Everything is there.  All my images, RAW and jpegs where in the Masters folder.
Aperture had already kind of organized it all into a Year/Month/Date system, so it wasn&#039;t hard to find stuff as long as you knew the approximate date.
I copied the contents of the Masters folder into my Pictures folder.  So now there are the Pictures/Year/Months/day etc.   Hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ssorzano<br />
I had the same problems.  Plus Aperture 3 ran like a sick dog.  When you right click on the Aperture library, which is probably in your Picture folder, you can choose Show Package Contents.   Everything is there.  All my images, RAW and jpegs where in the Masters folder.<br />
Aperture had already kind of organized it all into a Year/Month/Date system, so it wasn&#8217;t hard to find stuff as long as you knew the approximate date.<br />
I copied the contents of the Masters folder into my Pictures folder.  So now there are the Pictures/Year/Months/day etc.   Hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graphic Tuts &#124; Why I Switched from Apple Aperture to Adobe Bridge &#8211; GreyScaleGorilla</title>
		<link>http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/2009/09/why-i-switched-from-apple-aperture-to-adobe-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-28216</link>
		<dc:creator>Graphic Tuts &#124; Why I Switched from Apple Aperture to Adobe Bridge &#8211; GreyScaleGorilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 22:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/?p=3791#comment-28216</guid>
		<description>[...] via Why I Switched from Apple Aperture to Adobe Bridge &#124; greyscalegorilla/blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Why I Switched from Apple Aperture to Adobe Bridge | greyscalegorilla/blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/2009/09/why-i-switched-from-apple-aperture-to-adobe-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-23470</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 06:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/?p=3791#comment-23470</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think you are right that LR is a bit heavy if you just need to organize your stuff. I actually use LR, but I think I will swithch to Bridge and see how it goes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think you are right that LR is a bit heavy if you just need to organize your stuff. I actually use LR, but I think I will swithch to Bridge and see how it goes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ssorzano</title>
		<link>http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/2009/09/why-i-switched-from-apple-aperture-to-adobe-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-23420</link>
		<dc:creator>Ssorzano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 04:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/?p=3791#comment-23420</guid>
		<description>I have a question, which is the best way to get all of the images out of aperture to start organizing them in Bridge. The thing is I kind got excited with the way aperture let&#039;s me organize my projects, but then i realized that with bridge i have more editing control over my RAW files, but now i don&#039;t know which is the best way to make the switch, getting my pictures out of the aperture library into a simple file structure by year, month, day? Thanks a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question, which is the best way to get all of the images out of aperture to start organizing them in Bridge. The thing is I kind got excited with the way aperture let&#8217;s me organize my projects, but then i realized that with bridge i have more editing control over my RAW files, but now i don&#8217;t know which is the best way to make the switch, getting my pictures out of the aperture library into a simple file structure by year, month, day? Thanks a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/2009/09/why-i-switched-from-apple-aperture-to-adobe-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-21793</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 22:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/?p=3791#comment-21793</guid>
		<description>I tend to agree with Gorilla I think but I have been using Aperture for a while and have a LOT of years&#039; photos in there.  I have a feeling that you can use Aperture with your filing system rather than letting it do its thing but I never worked out how. 

Anyway, the point of my post is this:  say I want to give up on Aperture.  What&#039;s the quickest, easiest way to get all my stuff out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to agree with Gorilla I think but I have been using Aperture for a while and have a LOT of years&#8217; photos in there.  I have a feeling that you can use Aperture with your filing system rather than letting it do its thing but I never worked out how. </p>
<p>Anyway, the point of my post is this:  say I want to give up on Aperture.  What&#8217;s the quickest, easiest way to get all my stuff out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/2009/09/why-i-switched-from-apple-aperture-to-adobe-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-18365</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 04:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/?p=3791#comment-18365</guid>
		<description>Too bad Bridge still doesn&#039;t support drag-n-drop from browsers and Mail.app.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad Bridge still doesn&#8217;t support drag-n-drop from browsers and Mail.app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stepher</title>
		<link>http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/2009/09/why-i-switched-from-apple-aperture-to-adobe-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-14999</link>
		<dc:creator>Stepher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/?p=3791#comment-14999</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you Gorilla. It&#039;s taken a few versions of Bridge to get where we are with CS4, but the versatility of Bridge compared to Aperture and Lightroom makes it a great fit to a simple and good workflow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you Gorilla. It&#8217;s taken a few versions of Bridge to get where we are with CS4, but the versatility of Bridge compared to Aperture and Lightroom makes it a great fit to a simple and good workflow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ersin</title>
		<link>http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/2009/09/why-i-switched-from-apple-aperture-to-adobe-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-13695</link>
		<dc:creator>Ersin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/?p=3791#comment-13695</guid>
		<description>I think there is no better choice then Lightroom for managing(and not only managing) a (many) photography archive. LR + Bridge + PS !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is no better choice then Lightroom for managing(and not only managing) a (many) photography archive. LR + Bridge + PS !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gorilla &#171; Blog Archive &#171; this.is.caitie</title>
		<link>http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/2009/09/why-i-switched-from-apple-aperture-to-adobe-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-13549</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gorilla &#171; Blog Archive &#171; this.is.caitie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/?p=3791#comment-13549</guid>
		<description>[...] The beginning of the tutorial teaches about Adobe Bridge, something I&#8217;d always thought was an odd useless application that came with my CS3. Boy, was I ever wrong. I&#8217;d used Picasa under duress for years (because it was free), and just recently moved to Photoshop Elements, which frustrated me even more than Picasa did. I think Elements, as an all-in-one was just too powerful for my needs. (Especially sense I use Photoshop) And rather than attempt to explain the cool features of Bridge. Here is a blog post from the Gorilla. &#8220;Why I Switched from Apple Aperture to Adobe Bridge&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The beginning of the tutorial teaches about Adobe Bridge, something I&#8217;d always thought was an odd useless application that came with my CS3. Boy, was I ever wrong. I&#8217;d used Picasa under duress for years (because it was free), and just recently moved to Photoshop Elements, which frustrated me even more than Picasa did. I think Elements, as an all-in-one was just too powerful for my needs. (Especially sense I use Photoshop) And rather than attempt to explain the cool features of Bridge. Here is a blog post from the Gorilla. &#8220;Why I Switched from Apple Aperture to Adobe Bridge&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gorilla &#171; this.is.caitie</title>
		<link>http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/2009/09/why-i-switched-from-apple-aperture-to-adobe-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-13545</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gorilla &#171; this.is.caitie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greyscalegorilla.com/blog/?p=3791#comment-13545</guid>
		<description>[...] The beginning of the tutorial teaches about Adobe Bridge, something I&#8217;d always thought was an odd useless application that came with my CS3. Boy, was I ever wrong. I&#8217;d used Picasa under duress for years (because it was free), and just recently moved to Photoshop Elements, which frustrated me even more than Picasa did. I think Elements, as an all-in-one was just too powerful for my needs. (Especially sense I use Photoshop) And rather than attempt to explain the cool features of Bridge. Here is a blog post from the Gorilla. &#8220;Why I Switched from Apple Aperture to Adobe Bridge&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The beginning of the tutorial teaches about Adobe Bridge, something I&#8217;d always thought was an odd useless application that came with my CS3. Boy, was I ever wrong. I&#8217;d used Picasa under duress for years (because it was free), and just recently moved to Photoshop Elements, which frustrated me even more than Picasa did. I think Elements, as an all-in-one was just too powerful for my needs. (Especially sense I use Photoshop) And rather than attempt to explain the cool features of Bridge. Here is a blog post from the Gorilla. &#8220;Why I Switched from Apple Aperture to Adobe Bridge&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

